Crime
Thomas Crooks Who Attempted to Assassinate Donald Trump Acted Alone and Disclosed No Intent Prior to the Attack
WASHINGTON, D.C. — FBI Director Kash Patel has provided a comprehensive overview of the extensive federal investigation into Thomas Crooks, outlining the scope, methodology, and key findings of the case.
According to Director Patel, the investigation mobilized significant FBI resources, involving more than 480 employees across multiple field offices.
The agency conducted a sweeping review of Crooks’ activities and digital footprint in an effort to determine motive, possible accomplices, and whether the attack was coordinated with any organization or external entity.
The investigation included:
- Over 1,000 witness and associate interviews
- More than 2,000 public tips processed and evaluated
- Collection and analysis of data from 13 seized electronic devices
- Review of approximately 500,000 digital files
- Examination of financial activity associated with 10 accounts
- Analysis of 25 social media and online forum profiles linked to Crooks
- Synchronized review of hundreds of hours of surveillance and publicly submitted video footage
Investigators examined more than 20 verified online identities associated with Crooks and performed forensic extraction of data from phones, computers, storage devices, and cloud-based accounts.
Based on available evidence, investigators concluded:
- Crooks acted alone and did not conspire with others.
- He did not share or leak his intent prior to carrying out the attack.
- His online activity reflected limited communication and minimal interaction with others.
- No credible evidence was found to indicate involvement in extremist networks or coordinated planning beyond his sole actions.
Director Patel emphasized that despite the scale and depth of the inquiry, no co-conspirators or external involvement were identified.
“The scale of this investigation reflects the seriousness of the incident and our commitment to ensuring that no detail was overlooked,” Director Patel stated. “Our findings demonstrate that Thomas Crooks planned and executed the attack independently, with no indication that others were aware of or connected to his intent.”
Crime
Mustapha Kharbouch Now-Deleted 2024 Manifesto Published in Institute for Palestine Studies Recovered
Brown University has removed multiple online references to student activist Mustapha Kharbouch in the days following a deadly campus shooting, a move that has drawn public attention amid heightened online speculation—despite law enforcement officials confirming that no suspects or persons of interest have been identified in the investigation.
Archived versions of Brown University webpages show that Kharbouch, a first-year student at the time, was previously listed in several university-affiliated roles, including as a student assistant and Cultural Programming Coordinator connected to the Global Brown Center.
His academic interests were described as focusing on International and Public Affairs and Anthropology, with involvement in Middle East–focused academic, cultural, and student programming.
Those pages are no longer accessible, and Kharbouch’s social media accounts have also been deactivated.
A verified buyer from the United States with the name “Mustapha K.” reviewed a 9MM muzzle brake through the Wing Tactical website on December 29th, 2024 — the same caliber used in the Brown shooting.
There are approximately a few hundred people in the entire United States with that first name + last initial combination.
University officials have not issued a public explanation for the removal of the online profiles.
The changes occurred as online speculation intensified in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, with social media users circulating screenshots of archived university pages and past writings associated with Kharbouch.
Among the materials resurfaced by online users was a 2024 essay authored by Kharbouch and published by the Institute for Palestine Studies as part of a special student essay series titled Genocide in Gaza: Student Essays — Brown University Encampment 2024.
The essay, titled “I Hear the Voice of My Ancestors Calling: From the Camps to the Campus,” was published on August 13, 2024, months before the shooting. The piece is a first-person reflective essay examining Palestinian identity, intergenerational memory, student activism, and questions of hope amid displacement, war, and protest.
The article includes poetic excerpts adapted from “Ancestors Song,” a chant popularized during student-led Palestine solidarity actions at Brown University, and documents Kharbouch’s participation in campus organizing efforts, including sit-ins, hunger strikes, rallies, and the Brown Gaza Solidarity Encampment.
The essay situates these experiences within a broader discussion of decolonial thought, feminist theory, and Palestinian history, including reflections on the 1948 Nakba and the author’s family history as a third-generation stateless Palestinian refugee raised in Lebanon.
The content of the essay is ideological, autobiographical, and academic in nature.
There is no reference to violence on campus, nor any indication of intent or planning related to criminal activity.
The Institute for Palestine Studies has not issued any statement suggesting the piece is under review or connected to the shooting.
Despite widespread online conjecture, law enforcement agencies, including the FBI and Providence Police, have not named Mustapha Kharbouch as a suspect or person of interest, and have publicly stated that there is no evidence linking him to the shooting.
Investigators have emphasized that the case remains active and that conclusions are being guided strictly by verified evidence.
Authorities have cautioned against drawing inferences from online speculation, warning that unsubstantiated claims can compromise investigations and cause undue harm to individuals not implicated by facts.
Media analysts and campus observers have suggested that Brown University’s decision to remove online references may have been taken as a protective or precautionary measure, particularly as misinformation and harassment proliferated across social media platforms following the attack.
Similar actions have been taken by institutions in other high-profile incidents to limit doxxing, targeted harassment, or the misinterpretation of publicly available biographical information during periods of heightened tension.
Brown University has not confirmed whether the removals were temporary, administrative, or safety-related in nature.
Authorities continue to urge the public to rely on confirmed information released by law enforcement and to avoid amplifying unverified narratives.
As of the most recent update, no arrests have been announced, no individuals have been publicly identified as suspects, and the investigation remains ongoing.
Anyone with credible information related to the shooting has been asked to contact investigators directly.